Build Your AI Study Mentor
with Claude

My study plan is too generic. Rebuild it with full personalization: 1. Allocate 60% of daily time to my 3 weakest topics: [list them] 2. Follow the actual exam pattern — for [exam name], questions from [topic X] are worth 30% of paper. Weight my schedule accordingly. 3. Add a 15-minute daily "consolidation slot" to review previous day's notes 4. Flag the 5 highest-yield topics (most questions in exam) and ensure they appear every 4 days 5. Include a mock test day every 7 days with no new learning — only practice papers Show me the revised 2-week schedule in a table: Day | Topics | Duration | Type (Learn/Revise/Test)

These MCQs are too easy. The wrong options are obviously wrong. Regenerate with real distractors: For each question, the wrong options must: 1. Be plausible to a student who partially understands the topic — not obviously incorrect 2. Target specific misconceptions (e.g. confusing mitosis with meiosis stages) 3. Include at least one distractor that is true for a related concept but wrong here 4. Use numbers/values that are close to the correct answer (not wildly different) Also: increase difficulty by asking about exceptions, NOT the general rule. Students who only memorized basics will get these wrong. Regenerate the same [X] questions with these constraints.

This explanation is too long for revision. Rewrite it as a 2-minute revision note: STRICT CONSTRAINTS: - Maximum 5 bullet points - Each bullet maximum 15 words - First bullet: the core concept in one sentence - Second bullet: why it matters / what it causes - Third bullet: the most common exam question pattern for this topic - Fourth bullet: the most common mistake students make - Fifth bullet: one memory trick or mnemonic if applicable NO introductory sentences. NO "In summary." Start directly with bullet 1.

Re-prioritize my weakness analysis using two axes, not one: Axis 1 — EXAM WEIGHTAGE: How many marks / questions does this topic carry in [exam name]? Axis 2 — IMPROVEMENT SPEED: How quickly can a focused 1-week effort close this gap? (Fast / Medium / Slow) Create a 2x2 priority matrix: - HIGH weightage + FAST improvement = Fix this FIRST (spend 40% of weak-topic time here) - HIGH weightage + SLOW improvement = Fix SECOND (steady daily effort) - LOW weightage + FAST improvement = Fix THIRD (quick wins) - LOW weightage + SLOW improvement = Deprioritize (accept partial understanding) Give me this matrix with my specific topics placed in it, then a revised daily time allocation.

My exam is in [X] days. The standard spaced repetition intervals do not apply. Rebuild the revision schedule for exam crunch mode: CRUNCH MODE RULES (exam in under 14 days): 1. No new topics after Day [X-3] — revision only from that point 2. Compress spaced repetition: review critical topics every 2 days instead of 1-3-7 3. Day [X-1]: Only revision of formulas, definitions, high-frequency questions — no conceptual learning 4. Day [X]: 2-hour light review of your personal "error log" — topics you got wrong in mocks — then stop. Rest. Apply these rules to my specific topic list: [list topics] Output: Hour-by-hour schedule for the last [X] days before my exam.

Your output sounds like a textbook, not a tutor. Rewrite with a mentor voice: PERSONA: You are the student's favorite teacher — the one who believed in them when no one else did. You are direct, warm, and specific. You never say "great job" without explaining why. You never say "you should" without saying exactly what to do. VOICE RULES: 1. Address the student by name (use: [student name]) 2. Start with one sentence acknowledging where they are right now (not false praise) 3. Give specific instructions, not general advice 4. When you say something will be hard, say why and then say you will get through it 5. End with one concrete action to take in the next 10 minutes Rewrite the output with this voice. Same information, completely different feel.